Compare Lamborghini Diablo vs Audi R8 42 facelift vs Lamborghini Huracan
Variants
Diablo GT
Diablo VT 6.0
Diablo GT2
Diablo SE30
Diablo SV
Diablo VT
Diablo VT 1999
4.2 FSI
4.2 FSI DCT
5.2 FSI
5.2 FSI DCT
5.2 FSI V10 plus
5.2 FSI V10 plus DCT
LP 620-2 MT
LP 610-2
LP 580-2
LP 610-4
LP 640-2 STO
LP 640-4
LP 640-4 Performante
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
140 L / 4.9 cu-ft
100 L / 3.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
15.0 L / 15.9 qt
22.0 L / 23.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
100.0 L / 26.4 gal
Passengers
2
2
2
Payload
300 kg / 661 lbs
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
235/35 R19, 295/30 R19
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1252 mm / 49.3 in
Size | Length
4440 mm / 174.8 in
Size | Width
2040 mm / 80.3 in
Track Width | Front
1638.0 mm / 64.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2620 mm / 103.1 in
Performance
Braking | 200 km/h - 0
110.0 m / 360.8 ft
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
L 522
CSJ
Engine | Bore
87.0 mm / 3.4 in
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
12.7:1
Engine | Displacement
5.2 L / 317.6 cu-in / 5204.0 cc
Engine | Redline
8700 rpm
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
94%
89%
95%
Pros
- Iconic Lamborghini V12
- Iconic styling
- Scissor doors
- Improved V10 engine
- New DCT transmission
- Good handling
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Great performance
- Decent reliability
- Up to awe-inspiring 640hp of power
- Up to glorious 8700rpm redline
Cons
- Very high fuel consumption
- Very little cargo space
- Hard to handle
- Very little cargo space
- Very little cargo space
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.