Compare Honda CR-Z vs Honda Civic 7 Hatchback vs Honda Civic 10 Hatchback
Variants
1.4
1.4 AT
1.6
1.6 AT
1.7 CTDI
2.0 Type R
1.0 Turbo
1.0 Turbo CVT
1.4
1.5 Turbo 174 CVT
1.5 Turbo 180
1.5 Turbo 180 CVT
1.5 Turbo 182
1.5 Turbo 182 CVT
1.6 i-DTEC
1.8
Type-R 306
Type-R 320
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
225 L / 7.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/55 R16
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.3 ft
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
3-door Coupe
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1395 mm / 54.9 in
Size | Length
4078 mm / 160.6 in
Size | Width
2013 mm / 79.3 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Weight
1147.0 kg / 2528.7 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2435 mm / 95.9 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.4 sec
Fuel Economy
5.0 L/100km / 47.0 MPG (combined) | 6.1 L/100km / 38.6 MPG (urban) | 4.4 L/100km / 53.5 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.4:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1497.0 cc
Engine | Power
114.0 hp / 85.0 kW @ 6100 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
76.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
145 Nm / 106.9 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2016
2001 ~ 2005
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
38%
70%
Pros
- Great styling
- Punchy petrol engine
- Elegant styling
- Sweet manual transmission
- Superb engine reliability
- Fully independent suspensions
- Sweet and powerful engines
- Great 6-speed manual transmission
- New 9-speed auto gearbox
- Very low fuel consumption
- Great styling
- Improved interior space
- Fully-independent suspension setup
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- CVT
- Basic hybrid setup
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.