Compare Honda CR-Z vs Honda Fit vs Honda Fit 4

Variants
1.2
1.4
1.4 CVT
1.3 AWD
1.3
1.5 e:HEV
1.5 e:HEV AWD
Crosstar 1.3 AWD
Crosstar 1.3 CVT
Crosstar 1.5 e:HEV
Crosstar 1.5 e:HEV AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
225 L / 7.9 cu-ft
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1323 L / 46.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
4
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Tire Size
195/55 R16
185/55 R15
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.3 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Coupe
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1395 mm / 54.9 in
1525 mm / 60.0 in
Size | Length
4078 mm / 160.6 in
3830 mm / 150.8 in
Size | Width
2013 mm / 79.3 in
1675 mm / 65.9 in
Track Width | Front
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1445.0 mm / 56.9 in
Weight
1147.0 kg / 2528.7 lbs
980.0 kg / 2160.5 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
15 in
Wheelbase
2435 mm / 95.9 in
2450 mm / 96.5 in
2530 mm / 99.6 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.4 sec
Fuel Economy
5.0 L/100km / 47.0 MPG (combined) | 6.1 L/100km / 38.6 MPG (urban) | 4.4 L/100km / 53.5 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.4:1
10.8:1
13.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1497.0 cc
Engine | Power
114.0 hp / 85.0 kW @ 6100 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
76.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
145 Nm / 106.9 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
CVT

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2016
2002 ~ 2008
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
35%
16%
17%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Punchy petrol engine
  • Good styling
  • Good Honda L engine
  • Good manual transmission
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Still has I4 engines
Cons
  • Slow and sluggish
  • CVT
  • Basic hybrid setup
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.