Compare Nissan 200SX S15 vs Nissan 370Z vs Mazda RX-8

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
370Z
370Z 2018
370Z AT
370Z AT 2018
370Z NISMO
370Z NISMO AT
370Z NISMO EU
Renesis 2003
40th Anniversary
Revolution High-Power
Challenge High-Power
Type S

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
240 L / 8.5 cu-ft
290 L / 10.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.7 L / 9.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.9 L / 5.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
Passengers
4
2
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.0 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
115 mm / 4.5 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1285 mm / 50.6 in
Size | Length
4445 mm / 175.0 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2525 mm / 99.4 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.30
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
VQ37VHR
13B
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
1.3 L / 79.8 cu-in / 1308.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol rotary2 engine

Production

Availability
1999 ~ 2002

Reviews

Neofiliac score
72%
81%
84%
Pros
  • Good overall styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Good handling characteristics
  • Up to enjoyable 7500rpm redline
  • Some reliability concerns
  • Compact engine and lightweight chassis
  • Glorious 9000rpm redline
  • Great weight distribution
  • Double-wishbone + multilink suspension setup
  • Great handling characteristics
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Less handsome than the S14
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Not a thoroughbred

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.