Compare Hyundai i20 II Coupe vs Hyundai Accent 3 Hatchback vs Hyundai Veloster

Variants
1.0 T-GDI
1.2
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 CRDi
1.4
1.4 AT
1.5 CRDi
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6 GDI
1.6 GDI AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
336 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1011 L / 35.7 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
423 kg / 933 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
185/65 R14
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Coupe
3-door Hatchback
4-door Hatchback
Platform
Hyundai-Kia PB

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
149 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1449 mm / 57.0 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4045 mm / 159.3 in
4045 mm / 159.3 in
Size | Width
1730 mm / 68.1 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1513.0 mm / 59.6 in
1462.0 mm / 57.6 in
Weight
1070.0 kg / 2358.9 lbs
Wheel Size
5.5 J x14
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2500 mm / 98.4 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
112 g/km
Fuel Economy
4.8 L/100km / 49.0 MPG (combined) | 6.0 L/100km / 39.2 MPG (urban) | 4.1 L/100km / 57.4 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
77.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.4 mm / 3.4 in

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
18%
31%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Sleek styling
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Small turning circle
  • Exceptional design
  • Small turning circle
  • Good manual transmission
Cons
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Poor durability
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.