Compare Hyundai Coupe 2 vs Alfa Romeo Brera vs Hyundai Elantra 5 Coupe

Variants
1.6
2.0 136
2.0 136 AT
2.0 143
2.0 143 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
1.75 TBi
2.0 JTDm
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS AT
2.4 JTDm 200
2.4 JTDm AT
2.4 JTDm 210
3.2 JTS Q4 AT
3.2 JTS
3.2 JTS Q4

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
420 L / 14.8 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 610 L / 21.5 cu-ft
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.9 L / 6.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 215/45 R17
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1330 mm / 52.4 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4395 mm / 173.0 in
4539 mm / 178.7 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Weight
1238.0 kg / 2729.3 lbs
Wheel Size
7J x 16 H2
7.5 J x 17
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2530 mm / 99.6 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
7.4 L/100km / 31.8 MPG (combined) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (urban) | 6.0 L/100km / 39.2 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
ULEV
Engine
G4NB
Engine | Bore
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1797.0 cc
Engine | Power
148.0 hp / 110.4 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Redline
6800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
82.4 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
87.1 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
178 Nm / 131.3 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
22%
56%
18%
Pros
  • Decent suspension setup
  • Gorgeous styling
  • Characterful engine lineup (more modern than the GT)
  • Good handling characteristics
  • Good suspension setup
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
  • Bland styling
  • No powerful engine options
  • Not very well built
  • Unreliable
  • Awkward styling
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.