HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Alfa Romeo 4C vs Audi TT 8J vs Alfa Romeo Brera

Variants
Euro 5
Euro 6
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI Euro5
2.0 TDI quattro
2.0 TDI Euro5 quattro
2.0 TFSI 200
2.0 TFSI 200 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 200 DCT
2.0 TFSI 211
2.0 TFSI 211 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 211 DCT
3.2 quattro
3.2 quattro DCT
1.75 TBi
2.0 JTDm
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS AT
2.4 JTDm 200
2.4 JTDm AT
2.4 JTDm 210
3.2 JTS Q4 AT
3.2 JTS
3.2 JTS Q4

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 610 L / 21.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.6 L / 11.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
11.0 m / 35.9 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1183 mm / 46.6 in
Size | Length
3989 mm / 157.0 in
Track Width | Front
1639.0 mm / 64.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
Wheel Size
7.5 J x 17
Wheelbase
2380 mm / 93.7 in
2468 mm / 97.2 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.5 sec
CO2 Emission
157 g/km
Top Speed
258.0 km/h / 160.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.2:1
Engine | Displacement
1.7 L / 106.3 cu-in / 1742.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 2200-4250 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
78%
62%
56%
Pros
  • Superbly balanced
  • Good suspension setup
  • Sweet little engine
  • Much more affordable than the 8C
  • Smoother styling than the TTS and TT RS
  • VR6 engine
  • Decent handling
  • Gorgeous styling
  • Characterful engine lineup (more modern than the GT)
  • Good handling characteristics
  • Good suspension setup
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Very little cargo space
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Not RWD
  • Unreliable

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.