Compare Alfa Romeo 8C Competizione vs Audi TT 8J vs Alfa Romeo Brera
Variants
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI Euro5
2.0 TDI quattro
2.0 TDI Euro5 quattro
2.0 TFSI 200
2.0 TFSI 200 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 200 DCT
2.0 TFSI 211
2.0 TFSI 211 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 211 DCT
3.2 quattro
3.2 quattro DCT
1.75 TBi
2.0 JTDm
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS AT
2.4 JTDm 200
2.4 JTDm AT
2.4 JTDm 210
3.2 JTS Q4 AT
3.2 JTS
3.2 JTS Q4
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 610 L / 21.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.5 L / 13.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
9.0 L / 9.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
90.0 L / 23.8 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
285/35 ZR20
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 35.9 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1341 mm / 52.8 in
Size | Length
4381 mm / 172.5 in
Size | Width
1894 mm / 74.6 in
Wheel Size
7.5 J x 17
Wheelbase
2468 mm / 97.2 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
3.8 sec
Fuel Economy
15.8 L/100km / 14.9 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
306.0 km/h / 190.1 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
F136 YC
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
Engine | Displacement
4.7 L / 286.3 cu-in / 4691.0 cc
Engine | Power
450.0 hp / 335.6 kW @ 7000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
95.9 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
480 Nm / 354.0 lb-ft @ 4750 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
84%
62%
56%
Pros
- Superb drivetrain
- Great, sensual styling
- Sophisticated double-wishbone suspension setup
- Smoother styling than the TTS and TT RS
- VR6 engine
- Decent handling
- Gorgeous styling
- Characterful engine lineup (more modern than the GT)
- Good handling characteristics
- Good suspension setup
Cons
- Expensive
- Very high fuel consumption
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Not RWD
- Unreliable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.