Compare Alfa Romeo GT vs Alfa Romeo Brera vs Alfa Romeo 4C
Variants
1.8 TwinSpark
1.9 JTDm 150
2.0 JTS
2.0 JTS Selespeed
3.2
1.75 TBi
2.0 JTDm
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS AT
2.4 JTDm 200
2.4 JTDm AT
2.4 JTDm 210
3.2 JTS Q4 AT
3.2 JTS
3.2 JTS Q4
Euro 5
Euro 6
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
320 L / 11.3 cu-ft ~ 905 L / 32.0 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 610 L / 21.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.2 L / 7.6 qt
10.6 L / 11.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
4
4
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1183 mm / 46.6 in
Size | Length
3989 mm / 157.0 in
Track Width | Front
1639.0 mm / 64.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
Wheel Size
7.5 J x 17
Wheelbase
2596 mm / 102.2 in
2380 mm / 93.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.5 sec
CO2 Emission
157 g/km
Top Speed
258.0 km/h / 160.3 mph
Towing Capacity
1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Mid-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.2:1
Engine | Displacement
1.7 L / 106.3 cu-in / 1742.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 2200-4250 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2003 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
38%
56%
78%
Pros
- Beautiful styling
- Characterful Twin Spark engine
- Gorgeous styling
- Characterful engine lineup (more modern than the GT)
- Good handling characteristics
- Good suspension setup
- Superbly balanced
- Good suspension setup
- Sweet little engine
- Much more affordable than the 8C
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Questionable reliability
- Unreliable
- No powerful engine options
- Very little cargo space
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.