Compare SEAT Leon III SC vs SEAT Leon 4 vs Ford Focus 4 facelift
Variants
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 TGI 110
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 105 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 90
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TSI 265 DSG Cupra
2.0 TSI 265 Cupra
2.0 TSI 280 DSG Cupra
2.0 TSI 280 Cupra
2.0 TSI 290 Cupra
2.0 TSI 290 DSG Cupra
1.4 TSI 125 FR
1.4 TSI 150 FR
1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR
1.8 TSI 180 DSG FR
1.8 TSI 180 FR
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 DSG FR
2.0 TDI 150 DSG FR
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 FR
2.0 TDI 150 FR
2.0 TDI 184 Euro6 DSG FR
2.0 TDI 184 FR
1.0 eTSI DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 e-HYBRID DSG
1.5 eTSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TSI DSG
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155
1.0 EcoBoost 155 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280
ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280 AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
12.8 kWh (gross)
Body Style
3-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
144 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Length
4368 mm / 172.0 in
Size | Width
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Electric Range
58.0 km / 36.0 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Production
Availability
2022
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
17%
34%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
- Good handling
- Decent build quality
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poorly built
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Generic styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.