Compare SEAT Leon III SC vs SEAT Leon 4 vs Chevrolet Volt 2

Variants
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 TGI 110
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 105 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 90
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TSI 265 DSG Cupra
2.0 TSI 265 Cupra
2.0 TSI 280 DSG Cupra
2.0 TSI 280 Cupra
2.0 TSI 290 Cupra
2.0 TSI 290 DSG Cupra
1.4 TSI 125 FR
1.4 TSI 150 FR
1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR
1.8 TSI 180 DSG FR
1.8 TSI 180 FR
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 DSG FR
2.0 TDI 150 DSG FR
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 FR
2.0 TDI 150 FR
2.0 TDI 184 Euro6 DSG FR
2.0 TDI 184 FR
1.0 eTSI DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 e-HYBRID DSG
1.5 eTSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TSI DSG

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
301 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
33.7 L / 8.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
12.8 kWh (gross)
18.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
3-door Coupe
5-door plug-in hybrid Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
144 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1432 mm / 56.4 in
Size | Length
4368 mm / 172.0 in
4582 mm / 180.4 in
Size | Width
1809 mm / 71.2 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Weight
1607.0 kg / 3542.8 lbs
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2694 mm / 106.1 in

Performance

Electric Range
58.0 km / 36.0 mi
Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (urban)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
74.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc
Engine | Power
101.0 hp / 75.3 kW @ 5600 rpm + 149.0 hp / 111.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Redline
5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Multi-mode electric

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
17%
26%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Less ugly than before
  • Longer range than Mk1
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poorly built
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.