Compare SEAT Leon III SC vs SEAT Ibiza 5 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift Hatchback (2013-2016)

SEAT | Cars

Alfa Romeo | Cars

Variants

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 105 DSG

1.2 TSI 110

1.2 TSI 110 DSG

1.2 TSI 86

1.4 TGI 110

1.4 TSI 122

1.4 TSI 125

1.4 TSI 140

1.4 TSI 150

1.4 TSI 150 DSG

1.6 TDI 105 DSG

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 110

1.6 TDI 90

2.0 TDI 150 DSG

2.0 TDI 150

2.0 TSI 265 DSG Cupra

2.0 TSI 265 Cupra

2.0 TSI 280 DSG Cupra

2.0 TSI 280 Cupra

2.0 TSI 290 Cupra

2.0 TSI 290 DSG Cupra

1.4 TSI 125 FR

1.4 TSI 150 FR

1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR

1.8 TSI 180 DSG FR

1.8 TSI 180 FR

2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 DSG FR

2.0 TDI 150 DSG FR

2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 FR

2.0 TDI 150 FR

2.0 TDI 184 Euro6 DSG FR

2.0 TDI 184 FR

1.0 TSI 115

1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d

1.0 TSI 115 DSG

1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG

1.0 TSI 95

1.0 65

1.0 75

1.0 80

1.0 80 Euro6d

1.0 TGI 90 CNG

1.5 TSI 150 DSG

1.5 TSI 150

1.6 110

1.6 110 AT

1.6 90

1.6 TDI 80

1.6 TDI 95

1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d

1.6 TDI 95 DSG

0.9 TwinAir 105

1.3 JTD 85

1.4 70

1.4 78

1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT

1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

270 L / 9.5 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

13.8 deg

Offroad | Breakover Angle

9.8 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

15.8 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent, coil spring

Construction

Body Style

3-door Coupe

5-door Hatchback

3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

144 mm / 5.7 in

Size | Height

1444 mm / 56.9 in

1446 mm / 56.9 in

Size | Length

4059 mm / 159.8 in

4063 mm / 160.0 in

Size | Width

1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)

1720 mm / 67.7 in

Track Width | Front

1525.0 mm / 60.0 in

1483.0 mm / 58.4 in

Track Width | Rear

1505.0 mm / 59.3 in

1475.0 mm / 58.1 in

Wheelbase

2564 mm / 100.9 in

2511 mm / 98.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Production

Availability

2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score

27%

17%

23%

Pros

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Low official fuel consumption
More coherent design than Mk4

Low official fuel consumption

Cons

Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions
Low cargo capacity
More emission control systems to fail

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.