Compare SETA Ibiza 4 SportsCoupe vs Citroen C3 II vs Citroen C1 II 3-door
Variants
1.0 75
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 85
1.4 85 Euro5
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 80
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TFSI 180 Cupra
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR
1.4 TSI 180 DSG Cupra
1.6 105
1.6 105 DSG
1.6 81
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.8 TSI 192 Cupra
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 TDI 143
2.0 TDI 143 FR
1.0 68
1.1 60
1.2 110
1.2 82
1.2 82 AT
1.4 95
1.4 95 AT
1.4 95 AT
1.4 e-HDi 68 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 68 2013+
1.4i 73
1.6 120
1.6 120 2013+
1.6 120 AT
1.6 120 AT 2013+
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 BlueHDI 99
1.6 e-HDI 114 AT
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDI 92 2013+
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 e-HDI 92 AT 2013+
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.0 69
1.0 69 AT
1.2 82
1.0 72
1.0 72 Euro6d
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
196 L / 6.9 cu-ft ~ 780 L / 27.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
9.6 m / 31.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
3941 mm / 155.2 in
Size | Width
1693 mm / 66.7 in
1615 mm / 63.6 in | 1884 mm / 74.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
Wheelbase
2469 mm / 97.2 in
2466 mm / 97.1 in
2340 mm / 92.1 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
17%
13%
12%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Good 0.29 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Basic suspension setup
- Somewhat ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bug ugly
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.