Compare SETA Ibiza 4 SportsCoupe vs Citroen C2 vs Citroen DS4

Variants
1.0 75
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 85
1.4 85 Euro5
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 80
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TFSI 180 Cupra
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR
1.4 TSI 180 DSG Cupra
1.6 105
1.6 105 DSG
1.6 81
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.8 TSI 192 Cupra
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 TDI 143
2.0 TDI 143 FR
1.1i
1.1i Euro4
1.4 HDi
1.4 HDi AT
1.4 HDi Euro4
1.4i 75
1.4i 75 AT
1.4i 90 AT
1.6i 110 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6i 110 AT
1.6i 125
1.2 130
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 112
1.6 e-HDi 112 AT
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 115 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 156
1.6 THP 163 AT
1.6 THP 165 AT
1.6 THP 200
1.6 VTi 120
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 181 AT
2.0 HDi 163
2.0 HDi 163 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
166 L / 5.9 cu-ft ~ 879 L / 31.0 cu-ft
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1021 L / 36.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
41.0 L / 10.8 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1533 mm / 60.4 in
Size | Length
3666 mm / 144.3 in
4275 mm / 168.3 in
Size | Width
1693 mm / 66.7 in
1659 mm / 65.3 in | 1898 mm / 74.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheelbase
2469 mm / 97.2 in
2315 mm / 91.1 in
2612 mm / 102.8 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
3%
18%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to drive and park
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.