Compare SETA Ibiza 4 SportsCoupe vs Mazda 2 II vs Mazda 2 III

SETA Ibiza 4 SportsCoupe 3-door Hatchback (2008-2017)

Mazda 2 / Demio II (DE) Hatchback (2007-2014)

Mazda 2 / Demio III (DJ) Hatchback (2014-2019)

SEAT | Cars

Mazda | Cars

Variants

1.0 75

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 110 DSG

1.0 TSI 95

1.2 60

1.2 70

1.2 70 Euro5

1.2 TDI 75

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 105 DSG

1.2 TSI 85

1.2 TSI 90

1.4 85

1.4 85 Euro5

1.4 TDI 105

1.4 TDI 75

1.4 TDI 80

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TFSI 180 Cupra

1.4 TSI 140

1.4 TSI 150

1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR

1.4 TSI 180 DSG Cupra

1.6 105

1.6 105 DSG

1.6 81

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 90

1.6 TDI 90 DSG

1.8 TSI 192 Cupra

1.9 TDI 105

1.9 TDI 90

2.0 TDI 143

2.0 TDI 143 FR

1.3 75

1.3 75 Euro5

1.3 84

1.3 86

1.4 CD

1.5 102

1.5 102 AT

1.5 103

1.5 103 AT

1.6 CD 90

1.6 CD 95

1.5 SkyActiv-D

1.5 SkyActiv-G 115

1.5 SkyActiv-G 75

1.5 SkyActiv-G 90

1.5 SkyActiv-G 90 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 787 L / 27.8 cu-ft

280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 950 L / 33.5 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

43.0 L / 11.4 gal

44.0 L / 11.6 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Drum

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Turning Circle

9.8 m / 32.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

150 mm / 5.9 in

143 mm / 5.6 in

Size | Height

1495 mm / 58.9 in

Size | Length

4060 mm / 159.8 in

Size | Width

1693 mm / 66.7 in

1695 mm / 66.7 in | 1983 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)

Track Width | Front

1495.0 mm / 58.9 in

Track Width | Rear

1485.0 mm / 58.5 in

Wheelbase

2469 mm / 97.2 in

2490 mm / 98.0 in

2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.31

0.29

Towing Capacity

515 kg / 1135 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6

Reviews

Neofiliac score

17%

26%

Pros

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Small turning circle

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Very low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

Basic suspension setup
Somewhat ugly
Only available with small engines

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Bad 0-100kph time
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
Semi-independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.