Compare Cadillac XLR
Cadillac XLR | |
---|---|
Variants | XLR XLR-V |
Reviews | |
Neofiliac score | 89% |
Pros |
|
Cons |
|
Price | |
Offers (incl. referral links) | |
Remove |
[[{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Cargo Capacity","Fv":"125 L / 4.4 cu-ft ~ 328 L / 11.6 cu-ft"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Coolant Capacity","Fv":"12.0 L / 12.7 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Engine Oil Capacity","Fv":"7.6 L / 8.0 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Fuel Capacity","Fv":"68.0 L / 18.0 gal"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Passengers","Fv":"2"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Front","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Rear","Fv":"Disc"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Front","Fv":"Double-wishbone"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Rear","Fv":"Multi-link"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Tire Size","Fv":"235/50 R18"},{"Ft":"Construction","Fn":"Body Style","Fv":"2-door Coupe"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Height","Fv":"1279 mm / 50.4 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Length","Fv":"4513 mm / 177.7 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Width","Fv":"1836 mm / 72.3 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Front","Fv":"1580.0 mm / 62.2 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Rear","Fv":"1580.0 mm / 62.2 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Weight","Fv":"1690.0 kg / 3725.8 lbs"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheel Size","Fv":"8J X 18"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheelbase","Fv":"2685 mm / 105.7 in"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h","Fv":"5.9 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph","Fv":"5.6 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"CO2 Emission","Fv":"291 g/km"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Fuel Economy","Fv":"12.3 L/100km / 19.1 MPG (combined) | 18.2 L/100km / 12.9 MPG (urban) | 9.0 L/100km / 26.1 MPG (highway)"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Top Speed","Fv":"250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Drivetrain Layout","Fv":"Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Bore","Fv":"93.0 mm / 3.7 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Compression Ratio","Fv":"10.6:1"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Displacement","Fv":"4.6 L / 278.6 cu-in / 4565.0 cc"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Power","Fv":"325.0 hp / 242.4 kW @ 6400 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Specific Output","Fv":"71.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Stroke","Fv":"84.0 mm / 3.3 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Torque","Fv":"420 Nm / 309.8 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Type","Fv":"Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Gears","Fv":"5-speed"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Type","Fv":"Automatic"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Availability","Fv":"2003 ~ 2009"}]]
Related Products
Lexus SC 430 (Z40) 2001
- Sensuous, elegant styling
- Folding hard top
- Superb drivetrain reliability
· 97%
- Exceptional styling with top up or down
- Enjoyable 7500rpm redline
- Wonderful engine characteristics despite turbocharging
· 98%
Alpina B6 F12 2012
- Superb level of torque
- Good performance
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspensions
· 84%
BMW M6 F12 2012
- More power and torque than before
- Better electronics
- Manual transmission available
· 86%
BMW 6 Series F12 2011
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Improved styling
- Great performance
· 77%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.