Compare Toyota Land Cruiser J200 vs Nissan Armada
Variants
4.5D AT
4.5D Euro5 AT
4.6 309 AT
4.6 318 AT
4.7 AT
5.7 6AT
5.7 8AT
5.6 317 4WD
5.6 317
5.6 305
5.6 309 4WD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
566 L / 20.0 cu-ft ~ 2750 L / 97.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
106.0 L / 28.0 gal
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Offroad | Breakover Angle
21.0 deg
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
265/70 R18
Water Fording
700 mm / 27.6 in
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
226 mm / 8.9 in
250 mm / 9.8 in
Size | Height
1913 mm / 75.3 in
Size | Length
5255 mm / 206.9 in
Size | Width
2002 mm / 78.8 in
Track Width | Front
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
3130 mm / 123.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Top Speed
185.0 km/h / 115.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
98.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.8:1
Engine | Displacement
5.6 L / 338.8 cu-in / 5552.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
98%
60%
Pros
- Highest reliability record
- The best offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Superb fit and finish
- High cargo capacity
- Very imposing exterior
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High fuel consumption
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Very high fuel consumption
- Poor handling
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.