Compare Toyota Land Cruiser J200 vs Toyota Sequoia vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado J120

Variants
4.5D AT
4.5D Euro5 AT
4.6 309 AT
4.6 318 AT
4.7 AT
5.7 6AT
5.7 8AT
4.7 AWD
4.7 RWD
4.7 VVT-i AWD
2.7 AWD 5-door
2.7 AWD 3-door
3.0D 163 5-door
3.0D 163 3-door
3.0D 163 AT 5-door
3.0D 163 AT 3-door
3.0D 173 3-door
3.0D 173 5-door
4.0 AT 5-door
4.0 3-door
4.0 4AT 5-door
4.0 5AT 5-door

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
99.0 L / 26.2 gal
87.0 L / 23.0 gal
Passengers
5
Payload
650 kg / 1433 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Breakover Angle
21.0 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Solid axle
Solid axle
Water Fording
700 mm / 27.6 in

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
226 mm / 8.9 in
Size | Height
1860 mm / 73.2 in
Size | Length
5180 mm / 203.9 in
Size | Width
1980 mm / 78.0 in
Track Width | Front
1675.0 mm / 65.9 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1680.0 mm / 66.1 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Weight
2300.0 kg / 5070.6 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
3000 mm / 118.1 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
12.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
12.2 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Top Speed
175.0 km/h / 108.7 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
4.7 L / 284.6 cu-in / 4664.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
52.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
427 Nm / 314.9 lb-ft @ 3400 rpm
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
98%
76%
63%
Pros
  • Highest reliability record
  • The best offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Superb fit and finish
  • Superb drivetrain reliability
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Great offroad capabilities
  • Good drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • High fuel consumption
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Worse offroad capabilities than the Land Cruiser
  • Bland styling
  • Slow and sluggish
  • No powerful engine options
  • Bland styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.