Compare Toyota RAV4 IV vs Subaru Crosstrek 2 vs Toyota Yaris Cross
Variants
2.0 151 AWD
2.0 151 AWD CVT
2.0 151 Euro6 AWD
2.0 151 Euro6 AWD CVT
2.0D 124
2.0D 124 AWD
2.0D 143
2.2D AWD
2.2D AWD AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AWD AT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.5 CVT
1.5
1.5 4WD
1.5 Hybrid
1.5 Hybrid E-Four
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
589 L / 20.8 cu-ft ~ 1566 L / 55.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 294.64 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 274.32 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
19.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
215/50 R18
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Platform
TNGA: GA-B
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
221 mm / 8.7 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1615 mm / 63.6 in
1590 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4483 mm / 176.5 in
4180 mm / 164.6 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2664 mm / 104.9 in
2560 mm / 100.8 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
89.9 mm / 3.5 in
97.6 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
2020
Debut
2020-04-23
Made In
Japan, Malaysia, Thailand
Japan, France
Reviews
Neofiliac score
45%
36%
9%
Pros
- Good fuel economy
- High reliaiblity
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Some offroad capabilities
- Characterful engines
- Low fuel consumption
- Good reliability
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Ugly front-end
- No powerful engine options
- Horrible CVT
- Bad styling
- Basic interior
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Basic equipment
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor handling
- Bland
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.