Compare Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60) vs Toyota C-HR facelift vs Toyota RAV4 IV (XA40)

Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60)

Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota RAV4 IV (XA40)

Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60)Toyota C-HR faceliftToyota RAV4 IV (XA40)
Variants
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0T AWD AT
2.0T AT
2.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 151 AWD
2.0 151 AWD CVT
2.0 151 Euro6 AWD
2.0 151 Euro6 AWD CVT
2.0D 124
2.0D 124 AWD
2.0D 143
2.2D AWD
2.2D AWD AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AWD AT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score42%42%45%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good build quality
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good fuel economy
  • High reliaiblity
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Small engines
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Ugly front-end

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.