Compare Toyota 4Runner 4 vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado J150 3-door vs Toyota Land Cruiser J200
Variants
4.0 236
4.0 236 4WD
4.0 245
4.0 245 4WD 4AT
4.0 245 4WD 5AT
4.7 235
4.7 235 4WD
4.7 260
4.7 260 4WD
4.7 270
4.7 270 4WD
2.8D AWD
2.8D AWD AT
3.0D 173 AWD
3.0D 173 AWD AT
3.0D 190 AWD
3.0D AWD AT
4.5D AT
4.5D Euro5 AT
4.6 309 AT
4.6 318 AT
4.7 AT
5.7 6AT
5.7 8AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
381 L / 13.5 cu-ft ~ 1434 L / 50.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
87.0 L / 23.0 gal
87.0 L / 23.0 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
32.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
25.0 deg
21.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
42.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
24.0 deg
26.0 deg
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle, Multi-link
Solid axle
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Water Fording
700 mm / 27.6 in
700 mm / 27.6 in
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
3-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
205 mm / 8.1 in
226 mm / 8.9 in
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2790 mm / 109.8 in
2450 mm / 96.5 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.4 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Top Speed
188.0 km/h / 116.8 mph
175.0 km/h / 108.7 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 3000 kg / 6614 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Engine
1KD-FTV
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Stroke
103.0 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged commonrail diesel inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
76%
53%
98%
Pros
- Superb build quality
- Superb offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Good towing capacity
- Highest reliability record
- The best offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Superb fit and finish
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Small interior space
- Bad on-road performance
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High fuel consumption
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.