Compare Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253 vs Mercedes-Benz EQC N293 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253

Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253

Mercedes-Benz EQC N293

Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253

Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253Mercedes-Benz EQC N293Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253
Variants
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score60%28%60%
Pros
  • Great V8 in the 63AMG models
  • Cleaner exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Up to 436km electric range
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Great V8 in the 63AMG models
  • Cleaner exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Most engines are lethargic
  • Fuel-cell not widely available
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • BEV nonsense
  • Greenwashing
  • Most engines are lethargic
  • Fuel-cell not widely available

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.