Compare Kia Sorento 2 vs Mazda CX-7 vs Mazda CX-9 II
Variants
2.0 CRDi AWD
2.2 CRDi AWD
2.2 CRDi AWD AT
2.4 174 AWD AT
2.4 174 AWD
2.4 140 AWD AT
2.4 192 AWD
2.4 192 AWD AT
3.5 AWD AT
3.5 AT
2.2D
2.3 Turbo AWD AT
2.3 DiSi Turbo
2.3 DiSi Turbo AT
2.3 DiSi Turbo AWD AT
AWD
FWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 2017 L / 71.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.6 L / 9.1 qt
9.9 L / 10.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
69.0 L / 18.2 gal
Passengers
5
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
28.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
255/60 R18, 255/50 R20
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
191 mm / 7.5 in
216 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1645 mm / 64.8 in
1716 mm / 67.6 in
Size | Length
5065 mm / 199.4 in
Size | Width
1885 mm / 74.2 in
1969 mm / 77.5 in | 2207 mm / 86.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1621.0 mm / 63.8 in
1656.0 mm / 65.2 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18, 8.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2930 mm / 115.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Towing Capacity
1588 kg / 3501 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
Lambda II G6DC
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Power
250.0 hp / 186.4 kW @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
100.5 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
87.0 mm / 3.4 in
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
310 Nm / 228.6 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2016
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
36%
37%
Pros
- Improved styling
- High cargo capacity
- Small turning circle
- Good fuel efficiency
- Good styling
- Rather good engine
- High cargo capacity
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- No longer an SUV
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Crossover nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.