HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Kia Sorento 2 vs Fiat Sedici facelift vs Kia Soul

Variants
2.0 CRDi AWD
2.2 CRDi AWD
2.2 CRDi AWD AT
2.4 174 AWD AT
2.4 174 AWD
2.4 140 AWD AT
2.4 192 AWD
2.4 192 AWD AT
3.5 AWD AT
3.5 AT
1.6 4X2
1.6 4X2 AT
1.6 4X4
2.0 4X4
1.6
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 670 L / 23.7 cu-ft
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft ~ 570 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.6 L / 9.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
410 kg / 904 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
28.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
205/60 R16
195/65R15
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
191 mm / 7.5 in
Size | Height
1620 mm / 63.8 in
1661 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4115 mm / 162.0 in
4105 mm / 161.6 in
Size | Width
1885 mm / 74.2 in
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1621.0 mm / 63.8 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Weight
1270.0 kg / 2799.9 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2500 mm / 98.4 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Towing Capacity
1588 kg / 3501 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine
Lambda II G6DC
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
79.2 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
87.0 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2014
2009 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
35%
12%
14%
Pros
  • Improved styling
  • High cargo capacity
  • New FWD version is less pretentious
  • Distinct styling
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • High 0.38 drag coefficient
  • No longer an SUV
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.