HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Kia e-Niro vs Citroen C5 Aircross vs Citroen C4 III

Variants
42 kWh
67 kWh
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 HDi 110
1.5 HDi 130 AT
e-C4

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
451 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1405 L / 49.6 cu-ft
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1250 L / 44.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 305x25 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 300x10 mm
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
27.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
215/55 R17
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.2 kWh (gross)
50.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Body Style
5-door battery-electric SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
155 mm / 6.1 in
230 mm / 9.1 in
Size | Height
1570 mm / 61.8 in
Size | Length
4375 mm / 172.2 in
Size | Width
1805 mm / 71.1 in
1800 mm / 70.9 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1834 mm / 72.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2730 mm / 107.5 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Electric Range
50.0 km / 31.1 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2018 ~ 2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
28%
15%
15%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Smart styling
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor performance
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Horrible performance
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Crossover nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.