Compare Ford Expedition 2 (U222) vs Nissan Armada (TA60)

Ford Expedition 2 (U222)

Nissan Armada (TA60)

Ford Expedition 2 (U222)Nissan Armada (TA60)
Variants
4.6
4.6 4WD
5.4 263 4WD
5.4 263
5.4 304
5.4 304 4WD
5.6 317 4WD
5.6 317
5.6 305
5.6 309 4WD

Reviews

Neofiliac score58%60%
Pros
  • Stout drivetrain
  • Considerable offroad capabilities
  • Lots of space inside
  • High cargo capacity
  • Very imposing exterior
Cons
  • Poor fuel economy
  • Sluggish acceleration
  • Poor handling
  • Bland styling
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Poor handling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.