Compare BMW X1 F48 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

BMW X1 F48

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

BMW X1 F48Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)
16d sDrive
18d sDrive
18d sDrive Euro6df
18d sDrive AT
18d sDrive Euro6d AT
18d xDrive Euro6d
18d xDrive
18d xDrive AT
18d xDrive Euro6d AT
18i sDrive
18i sDrive AT
18i sDrive Euro6d
18i sDrive Euro6d AT
20d sDrive
20d sDrive AT
20d xDrive AT
20d xDrive Euro6d AT
20i sDrive Euro6d AT
20i sDrive AT
20i xDrive AT
20i xDrive Euro6d AT
25d xDrive AT
25i xDrive AT
25i xDrive Euro6d AT
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P300e AWD


Neofiliac score31%27%
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Effeminate styling
  • Only available with small engines
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front


Offers (incl. referral links)
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.