Compare Jeep Grand Cherokee WK vs Toyota Land Cruiser J200 vs Toyota FJ Cruiser

Variants
3.0 CRD 4WD
3.0 CRD
3.7 201 4WD
3.7 214 4WD
3.7 214
4.7 231 4WD
4.7 238 4WD
4.7 238
4.7 309 4WD
4.7 309
5.7 326 4WD
5.7 335 4WD
5.7 335
5.7 352 4WD
5.7 362 4WD
5.7 362
SRT8
4.5D AT
4.5D Euro5 AT
4.6 309 AT
4.6 318 AT
4.7 AT
5.7 6AT
5.7 8AT
MT
AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
9.8 L / 10.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.1 L / 6.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Offroad | Breakover Angle
21.0 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Multi-link
Solid axle
Tire Size
265/70 R17
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
12.8 m / 42.0 ft
Water Fording
700 mm / 27.6 in

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
226 mm / 8.9 in
Size | Height
1829 mm / 72.0 in
Size | Length
4671 mm / 183.9 in
Size | Width
1894 mm / 74.6 in
Track Width | Front
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2781 mm / 109.5 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.4 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Fuel Economy
14.7 L/100km / 16.0 MPG (urban) | 12.4 L/100km / 19.0 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine
1GR-FE
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 244.1 cu-in / 4000.0 cc
Engine | Power
239.0 hp / 178.2 kW @ 5200 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
59.8 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
278 Nm / 205.0 lb-ft @ 3700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
68%
98%
83%
Pros
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Interesting Hemi engines
  • Cool styling for the SRT-8
  • Highest reliability record
  • The best offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Superb fit and finish
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Interesting retro styling
  • Superb build quality
  • Very reliable
Cons
  • High 0.39 drag coefficient
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • High fuel consumption
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.