Compare Mazda CX-5 (KE) vs Mazda CX-3 (DK) vs Mazda CX-9 II (TC)

Mazda CX-5 (KE)

Mazda CX-3 (DK)

Mazda CX-9 II (TC)

Mazda CX-5 (KE)Mazda CX-3 (DK)Mazda CX-9 II (TC)
Variants
2.0 160 AWD
2.0 160 AWD AT
2.0 165
2.0 160 Euro6 AWD
2.0 160 Euro6 AWD AT
2.0 165 Euro6
2.2D 150
2.2D 150 AWD
2.2D 150 AWD AT
2.2D 150 AT
2.2D 175 AWD
2.2D 175 AWD AT
2.5 192 AWD AT
1.5d
1.5d 4WD
1.5d AWD AT
1.8 Skyactiv-D
1.8 Skyactiv-D AWD
1.8 Skyactiv-D AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G 121
2.0 Skyactiv-G 121 AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G 148 AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G 150 AWD
2.0 Skyactiv-G 150 AWD AT
2.0i
2.0i AT
AWD
FWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score45%23%37%
Pros
  • Good exterior styling
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Good styling
  • Rather good engine
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.