Compare Opel Grandland X vs Mini Countryman F60 LCI vs Opel Crossland X
Variants
1.2 Turbo 130
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d
1.2 Turbo 130 AT
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d AT
1.5d 130
1.5d 130 AT
1.6 Turbo 180 AT
1.6 Turbo 224 PHEV
1.6 Turbo 300 PHEV AWD
1.6d 120
1.6d 120 AT
2.0d 177 AT
Cooper
Cooper ALL4 AT
Cooper AT
Cooper D 1.5
Cooper D 1.5 AT
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper D 2.0 ALL4 AT
Cooper D 2.0 AT
Cooper S
Cooper S ALL4 AT
Cooper S AT
Cooper SD ALL4 AT
Cooper SD AT
Cooper SE ALL4 AT
1.2 81
1.2 83
1.2 Turbo 110
1.2 Turbo 110 AT
1.2 Turbo 110 Euro6d
1.2 Turbo 110 Euro6d AT
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d
1.2 Turbo 130
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d AT
1.5d 102
1.5d 120 AT
1.6 120
1.6 99
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
410 L / 14.5 cu-ft ~ 1255 L / 44.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Breakover Angle
14.4 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.2 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.2 kWh (gross) | 11.5 kWh (net)
10.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
188 mm / 7.4 in
Size | Height
1609 mm / 63.3 in
1605 mm / 63.2 in
Size | Length
4477 mm / 176.3 in
4297 mm / 169.2 in
4212 mm / 165.8 in
Size | Width
1822 mm / 71.7 in | 2001 mm / 78.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1513.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheelbase
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2604 mm / 102.5 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2017
Facelift
2020-05-27
Made In
Netherlands, India, Indonesia, Malaysia
Reviews
Neofiliac score
18%
32%
6%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent handling
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor performance
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible styling
- Crossover nonsense
- Limited utility
- Rather ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.