Compare Opel Mokka vs Audi Q3 8U vs Opel Crossland X

Variants
1.4 Turbo
1.4 Turbo AT
1.4 Turbo AWD
1.6
1.6 CDTI 110
1.6 CDTI 136
1.6 CDTI 136 AT
1.6 CDTI 136 AWD
1.7 CDTI 130
1.7 CDTI 130 AWD
1.4 TFSI
1.4 TFSI S-Tronic
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 140PS quattro
2.0 TDI 140PS quattro S-Tronic
2.0 TDI 177PS
2.0 TDI 177PS quattro
2.0 TDI 177PS quattro S-Tronic
2.0 TFSI 170PS quattro
2.0 TFSI 170PS quattro S-Tronic
2.0 TFSI 211PS quattro S-Tronic
1.2 81
1.2 83
1.2 Turbo 110
1.2 Turbo 110 AT
1.2 Turbo 110 Euro6d
1.2 Turbo 110 Euro6d AT
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d
1.2 Turbo 130
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d AT
1.5d 102
1.5d 120 AT
1.6 120
1.6 99

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
356 L / 12.6 cu-ft ~ 1372 L / 48.5 cu-ft
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
410 L / 14.5 cu-ft ~ 1255 L / 44.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.3 L / 5.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Tire Size
215/55 R18
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
158 mm / 6.2 in
Size | Height
1608 mm / 63.3 in
1605 mm / 63.2 in
Size | Length
4278 mm / 168.4 in
4385 mm / 172.6 in
4212 mm / 165.8 in
Size | Width
1831 mm / 72.1 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
1513.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheelbase
2555 mm / 100.6 in
2603 mm / 102.5 in
2604 mm / 102.5 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1

Reviews

Neofiliac score
8%
25%
6%
Pros
  • Looks decent from some angles
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly crossover form factor
  • Rather ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.