HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Kodiaq vs Mazda CX-9 II vs Mazda CX-7

Variants
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 150 4x4
1.4 TSI 150 4x4 DSG
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 4x4 DSG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 150 4x4
2.0 TDI 150 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 177 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 180 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 4x4 DSG
GT 186 AT
GT 220 4x4 DSG
RS 4x4 DSG
AWD
FWD
2.2D
2.3 Turbo AWD AT
2.3 DiSi Turbo
2.3 DiSi Turbo AT
2.3 DiSi Turbo AWD AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 2017 L / 71.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.9 L / 10.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
69.0 L / 18.2 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
255/60 R18, 255/50 R20
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
216 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1716 mm / 67.6 in
1645 mm / 64.8 in
Size | Length
5065 mm / 199.4 in
Size | Width
1969 mm / 77.5 in | 2207 mm / 86.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1656.0 mm / 65.2 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18, 8.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2930 mm / 115.4 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in

Powertrain

Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Power
250.0 hp / 186.4 kW @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
100.5 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
310 Nm / 228.6 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
42%
37%
36%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good styling
  • Rather good engine
  • High cargo capacity
  • Small turning circle
  • Good fuel efficiency
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.