Compare Skoda Kodiaq vs GMC Acadia 2 facelift vs GMC Terrain 2 facelift
Variants
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 150 4x4
1.4 TSI 150 4x4 DSG
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 4x4 DSG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 150 4x4
2.0 TDI 150 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 177 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 180 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 4x4 DSG
GT 186 AT
GT 220 4x4 DSG
RS 4x4 DSG
2.0
2.0 AWD
2.5
3.6
3.6 AWD
FWD
AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
362 L / 12.8 cu-ft ~ 2237 L / 79.0 cu-ft
838 L / 29.6 cu-ft ~ 1792 L / 63.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.6 L / 7.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Passengers
5 / 7
7
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 320 mm
Ventilated discs, 300 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs, 315 mm
Disc, 288 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/65 R17, 255/65 R17, 235/65 R18, 235/55 R20
225/65 R17, 225/60 R18, 235/50 R19
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
183 mm / 7.2 in
175 mm / 6.9 in
Size | Height
1676 mm / 66.0 in
1661 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4917 mm / 193.6 in
4630 mm / 182.3 in
Size | Width
1915 mm / 75.4 in
1839 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1638.0 mm / 64.5 in
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1638.0 mm / 64.5 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Wheelbase
2858 mm / 112.5 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
680 kg / 1499 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine
LYX
Engine | Bore
74.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc
Engine | Power
173.0 hp / 129.0 kW @ 5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
116.1 hp/L / 1.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
275 Nm / 202.8 lb-ft @ 2000-4000 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
9-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic 9T65
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Production
Availability
2020
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
34%
17%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- High cargo capacity
- Decent styling
- Somewhat efficient
- Save on fuel cost
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Build quality concerns
- No powerful engine options
- Poor offroad capabilities
- Only available with tiny engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.