Compare Fiat Sedici facelift vs Volvo XC40

Fiat Sedici facelift

Volvo XC40

Fiat Sedici faceliftVolvo XC40
Variants
1.6 4X2
1.6 4X2 AT
1.6 4X4
2.0 4X4
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor

Reviews

Neofiliac score12%32%
Pros
  • New FWD version is less pretentious
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.