Compare Subaru Crosstrek vs Subaru Forester 2 vs Acura ZDX

Variants
1.6 CVT
1.6 MT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0D
2.0DL
2.0X
2.0X AT
2.0XT
2.0XT AT
2.5 158PS
2.5 158PS AT
2.5 165PS
2.5 165PS AT
2.5 173PS
2.5 173PS AT
2.5T

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
1270 L / 44.8 cu-ft
406 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1525 L / 53.9 cu-ft
779 L / 27.5 cu-ft ~ 1971 L / 69.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
79.5 L / 21.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
545 kg / 1202 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/55 R17
P255/50 R19 103H
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.7 m / 38.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Size | Height
1596 mm / 62.8 in
Size | Length
4450 mm / 175.2 in
4450 mm / 175.2 in
4887 mm / 192.4 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
1735 mm / 68.3 in
1995 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
1719.0 mm / 67.7 in
Weight
2019.0 kg / 4451.1 lbs
Wheel Size
7J x 17
8.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2635 mm / 103.7 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in

Performance

Fuel Economy
12.4 L/100km / 19.0 MPG (combined) | 14.7 L/100km / 16.0 MPG (urban) | 10.2 L/100km / 23.1 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Engine
J37A5
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
Engine | Power
300.0 hp / 223.7 kW @ 6300 rpm
Engine | Torque
366 Nm / 269.9 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2017
2009 ~ 2013

Reviews

Neofiliac score
33%
34%
13%
Pros
  • Fully independent suspension setup
  • Characteristic H4 engiens
  • Symmetric AWD
  • Reliable V6 engine
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No powerful engine options
  • MacPherson front suspensions
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Rather ugly and pointless

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.