Compare Chrysler Aspen vs Chevrolet Tahoe 3 (GMT900) vs Jeep Wrangler 4 (JL)

Chrysler Aspen

Chevrolet Tahoe 3 (GMT900)

Jeep Wrangler 4 (JL)

Chrysler AspenChevrolet Tahoe 3 (GMT900)Jeep Wrangler 4 (JL)
Variants
4.7 4WD
4.7
4.7 FlexFuel 4WD
4.7 FlexFuel
5.7 335 4WD
5.7 335
5.7 376 4WD
5.7 376
5.7 Hybrid 4WD
4.8
5.3 4AT
5.3 AWD 4AT
5.3 AWD 6AT
5.3 FlexFuel
5.3 FlexFuel AWD
6.0 Hybrid AWD CVT
6.0 Hybrid CVT
6.2 AWD
2.0 Rubicon
2.0 Sahara
2.0 Sport
2.2 Rubicon
2.2 Sahara
3.6 Rubicon
3.6 Rubicon MT

Reviews

Neofiliac score65%79%72%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Powerful engines
  • Solid on-road performance
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Small turning circle
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • High 0.39 drag coefficient
  • Some fit and finish problems
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.