Compare Toyota Ractis vs Citroen C8 vs Citroen C3 Picasso
Variants
1.3
1.5
2.0 HDi 163
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 HDi 109
2.0 HDi 109 AT
2.0 HDi 120
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 136
2.0 136 AT
2.0 140
2.0 140 AT
2.2 HDi 128
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170 AT
2.2 158
3.0 204 AT
1.4 VTi
1.4 VTi Euro5
1.4 VTi LPG
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 112PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 VTi 115PS
1.6 VTi 120PS
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
225 L / 7.9 cu-ft ~ 2948 L / 104.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
5
7
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
175/60 R16
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1640 mm / 64.6 in
1669 mm / 65.7 in
Size | Length
3995 mm / 157.3 in
4727 mm / 186.1 in
4078 mm / 160.6 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
Wheelbase
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2823 mm / 111.1 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.308
Fuel Economy
5.5 L/100km / 42.8 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
1NZ-FE
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
12%
20%
2%
Pros
- Very easy to drive and park
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Easy to fix
Cons
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Some unreliable petrol engines
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor automatic transmissions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very ugly
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.