Compare Toyota Sienta vs Toyota Ractis vs Kia Venga

Variants
1.3
1.5
1.4
1.4 CRDI 77
1.4 CRDI 90
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6 CRDI 115
1.6 CRDI 128

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
Passengers
7
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Drum
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent Torsion
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
175/70 R14
175/60 R16
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height
1670 mm / 65.7 in
1640 mm / 64.6 in
1600 mm / 63.0 in
Size | Length
4100 mm / 161.4 in
3995 mm / 157.3 in
4068 mm / 160.2 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheel Size
5.5JJ x 14
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in

Performance

Fuel Economy
5.5 L/100km / 42.8 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine
1NZ-FE
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.3 cu-in / 1496.0 cc
Engine | Power
110.0 hp / 82.0 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
73.5 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
84.7 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
143 Nm / 105.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2003 ~ 2015
2005 ~ 2010
2010 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
39%
12%
18%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Beautiful design
  • Very easy to drive and park
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
Cons
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Uninspiring

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.