Compare Renault Grand Espace 4 vs Renault Modus vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso
Variants
1.9 dCi
2.0 dCi 130
2.0 dCi 131
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 AT
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 173
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 TCe 170
2.0 TCe 170 Euro5
2.0 TCe 170 AT
2.0 Turbo 163
2.0 Turbo 163 AT
2.0 Turbo 170
2.0 Turbo 170 AT
2.2 dCi 139 AT
2.2 dCi 150
2.2 dCi 150 AT
3.0 dCi 177 AT
3.0 dCi 181 AT
3.5 AT
3.5 Euro3 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2
1.4
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 88
1.6 HDi 112 AT
1.6 HDi 109 6MT
1.6 HDi 109 5MT
1.6 HDi 109 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 140 AT
1.6 150 AT
1.6 156 AT
1.6 120 Euro5
1.6 120
1.8 125
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 140 4AT
2.0 140 6AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
456 L / 16.1 cu-ft ~ 3050 L / 107.7 cu-ft
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft ~ 1951 L / 68.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
83.0 L / 21.9 gal
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
7
5
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1589 mm / 62.6 in
1660 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4590 mm / 180.7 in
Size | Width
1830 mm / 72.0 in | 2100 mm / 82.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1574.0 mm / 62.0 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2482 mm / 97.7 in
2728 mm / 107.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
0.31
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Reviews
Neofiliac score
31%
6%
24%
Pros
- Very high cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Lots of space inside
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- More interior space than the Picasso
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Rather bad design
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Rather uglier than the Picasso
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.