Compare Renault Scenic 3 vs BMW 2 Series Active Tourer U06 vs Renault Grand Scenic 4

Renault Scenic 3

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer U06

Renault Grand Scenic 4

Renault Scenic 3BMW 2 Series Active Tourer U06Renault Grand Scenic 4
Variants
1.2 TCe 114
1.2 TCe 132
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 110 Euro5
1.5 dCi 110 Euro5
1.6
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 CVT
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 160
2.0 dCi 165
2.0 Euro5 CVT
218d
218i
220i
223i
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 110 Hybrid
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 160 AT
1.7 dCi 120
1.7 dCi 120 AT
1.7 dCi 150
1.7 dCi 150 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score16%32%10%
Pros
  • More interior space than the Megane on which it is based
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.