Compare Renault Scenic 3 vs Mercedes B-class W246 facelift vs Renault Grand Modus

Variants
1.2 TCe 114
1.2 TCe 132
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 110 Euro5
1.5 dCi 110 Euro5
1.6
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 CVT
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 160
2.0 dCi 165
2.0 Euro5 CVT
B 160
B 160 DCT
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI
B 180 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 CDI DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 Natural Gas Drive
B 200 Natural Gas Drive DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
1.2
1.2 TCe
1.5 dCi 103 AT
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86 5MT
1.5 dCi 86 6MT
1.6 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
305 L / 10.8 cu-ft ~ 1454 L / 51.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.2 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
98 mm / 3.9 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1589 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4034 mm / 158.8 in
Size | Width
1709 mm / 67.3 in | 1960 mm / 77.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
Wheelbase
2702 mm / 106.4 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2575 mm / 101.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
16%
25%
3%
Pros
  • More interior space than the Megane on which it is based
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • 4MATIC nonsense
  • Half-hearted product
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.