Compare Volkswagen Touran vs Mazda 5 vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso II
Variants
1.2 TSI 105
1.4 TSI 140 Euro5
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 140 7DSG
1.4 TSI 140 6DSG
1.4 TSI 170 6DSG
1.4 TSI 170 7DSG
1.6 FSI 115
1.6 102
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 105 7DSG
1.6 TDI 90
1.9 TDI 100
1.9 TDI 100 AT
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 105 DSG
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 FSI 150
2.0 TDI 136
2.0 TDI 136 AT
2.0 TDI 140 Euro5
2.0 TDI 140
2.0 TDI 140 Euro5 DSG
2.0 TDI 140 DSG
2.0 TDI 170
2.0 TDI 170 Euro5 DSG
2.0 TDI 170 DSG
2.0 TDI 177 DSG
1.8
2.0
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
1.2 131
1.2 131 AT
1.6 120
1.6 156
1.6 165 AT
1.6 HDi 116
1.6 HDi 116 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 HDi 92 AT
1.6 HDi 99
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
7
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1638 mm / 64.5 in
Size | Length
4505 mm / 177.4 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1826 mm / 71.9 in | 2117 mm / 83.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1971 mm / 77.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.30
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
51%
37%
33%
Pros
- Good offroad capabilities
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good interior seating / cargo space
- Low fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Improved exterior styling
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Not as handsome as the 5-seater
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.