Compare Ford Galaxy 2 vs Ford Galaxy 3 vs Chrysler Voyager 4

Variants
1.8 TDCi 101
1.8 TDCi 125
2.0 AT
2.0
2.0 TDCi 130
2.0 TDCi 140
2.2 TDCi 175
2.3
1.5 160
1.5 165
2.0D 120 Euro6d
2.0D 150 Euro6d AT
2.0D 150 Euro6d AWD
2.0D 150 Euro6d
2.0D 190 Euro6d AT
2.0D 190 Euro6d AWD AT
2.0D 190 Euro6d
2.0D Bi-Turbo 240 AT
2.0 240 AT
2.0D 120
2.0D 150 AWD
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 180 AWD AT
2.0D 180 AT
2.0D 180
2.0D 210 AT
2.4 147
2.4 147 AT
2.4 152
2.4 152 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3 AT
3.3 AWD AT
3.8
3.8 AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
308 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 2325 L / 82.1 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 2339 L / 82.6 cu-ft
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 4080 L / 144.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
7
5 / 7
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Tire Size
235/55 R17, 235/50 R18, 245/45 R19
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
124 mm / 4.9 in
Size | Height
1723 mm / 67.8 in
1747 mm / 68.8 in
1750 mm / 68.9 in
Size | Length
4820 mm / 189.8 in
4848 mm / 190.9 in
4805 mm / 189.2 in
Size | Width
1854 mm / 73.0 in
1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)
1995 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1589.0 mm / 62.6 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 19
16 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2849 mm / 112.2 in
2880 mm / 113.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4

Reviews

Neofiliac score
47%
48%
27%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good automatic transmission
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Lots of interior space
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No in dependent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.