Compare Honda Odyssey 3 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 5 vs Chrysler Voyager 4
Variants
FWD
AWD
2.4
2.8D 150
2.8D 163 AT
3.3
3.8 AT
2.4 147
2.4 147 AT
2.4 152
2.4 152 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3 AT
3.3 AWD AT
3.8
3.8 AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 1235 L / 43.6 cu-ft
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 4080 L / 144.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
7
7
7
Payload
1200 kg / 2646 lbs
545 kg / 1202 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Tire Size
215/60 R16
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1750 mm / 68.9 in
Size | Length
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4805 mm / 189.2 in
Size | Width
1800 mm / 70.9 in
1995 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Weight
1600.0 kg / 3527.4 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 16
16 in
Wheelbase
2830 mm / 111.4 in
2880 mm / 113.4 in
Performance
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
K24
Engine | Bore
87.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.7:1
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 143.7 cu-in / 2354.0 cc
Engine | Power
160.0 hp / 119.3 kW @ 5500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
68.0 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
99.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
218 Nm / 160.8 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
49%
30%
27%
Pros
- Superb drivetrain reliability
- Beautiful design
- Lots of interior space
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of interior space
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of interior space
Cons
- Uninspiring
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Poor suspension setup
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- No in dependent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.