Compare Honda Stream vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 4
Variants
1.7
2.0 AWD AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3
3.3 AWD
3.8
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
158 L / 5.6 cu-ft ~ 1520 L / 53.7 cu-ft
920 L / 32.5 cu-ft ~ 4130 L / 145.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
7
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1997 mm / 78.6 in
Track Width | Front
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheel Size
15 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
3030 mm / 119.3 in
Powertrain
Engine
K20
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2001 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
46%
26%
Pros
- Excellent styling
- Wonderful drivetrain reliability
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of interior space
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.