Compare Citroen Grand C4 Picasso II vs Skoda Roomster (5J) vs Citroen C8

Citroen Grand C4 Picasso II

Skoda Roomster (5J)

Citroen C8

Citroen Grand C4 Picasso IISkoda Roomster (5J)Citroen C8
Variants
1.2 131
1.2 131 AT
1.6 120
1.6 156
1.6 165 AT
1.6 HDi 116
1.6 HDi 116 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 HDi 92 AT
1.6 HDi 99
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
1.2 64
1.2 70
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 AT
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 86 Euro5
1.4 86
1.4 TDI 70
1.4 TDI 80
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.9 TDI 103
2.0 HDi 163
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 HDi 109
2.0 HDi 109 AT
2.0 HDi 120
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 136
2.0 136 AT
2.0 140
2.0 140 AT
2.2 HDi 128
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170 AT
2.2 158
3.0 204 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score33%17%20%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved exterior styling
  • Lots of usable space inside for such a small car
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Not as handsome as the 5-seater
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Some unreliable petrol engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor automatic transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.