Compare Citroen C4 Picasso II vs Citroen C8
Variants
1.2 110
1.2 130
1.2 131
1.2 131 AT
1.6 120
1.6 156
1.6 165 AT
1.6 HDi 116
1.6 HDi 116 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 HDi 92 AT
1.6 HDi 99
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
2.0 HDi 163
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 HDi 109
2.0 HDi 109 AT
2.0 HDi 120
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 136
2.0 136 AT
2.0 140
2.0 140 AT
2.2 HDi 128
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170 AT
2.2 158
3.0 204 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
225 L / 7.9 cu-ft ~ 2948 L / 104.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
5
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Length
4727 mm / 186.1 in
Track Width | Front
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2785 mm / 109.6 in
2823 mm / 111.1 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
20%
Pros
- Much improved exterior styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Some unreliable petrol engines
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor automatic transmissions
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.