HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Citroen Grand C4 Picasso vs Citroen C3 Picasso vs Mercedes B-class W246 facelift

Variants
1.6 HDi 112 AT
1.6 HDi 109 6MT
1.6 HDi 109 5MT
1.6 HDi 109 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 140 AT
1.6 150 AT
1.6 156 AT
1.6 120 Euro5
1.6 120
1.8 125
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 140 4AT
2.0 140 6AT
1.4 VTi
1.4 VTi Euro5
1.4 VTi LPG
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 112PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 VTi 115PS
1.6 VTi 120PS
B 160
B 160 DCT
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI
B 180 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
B 180 CDI DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 Natural Gas Drive
B 200 Natural Gas Drive DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft ~ 1951 L / 68.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
7
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
98 mm / 3.9 in
Size | Height
1660 mm / 65.4 in
1669 mm / 65.7 in
Size | Length
4590 mm / 180.7 in
4078 mm / 160.6 in
Size | Width
1830 mm / 72.0 in | 2100 mm / 82.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
Wheelbase
2728 mm / 107.4 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
0.308

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
2%
25%
Pros
  • More interior space than the Picasso
  • Easy to fix
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Rather uglier than the Picasso
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup
  • 4MATIC nonsense
  • Half-hearted product

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.