Compare Kia Carens 3 vs Citroen C4 Picasso II
Variants
1.6
1.6 Euro6
1.7 CRDi 115
1.7 CRDi 136
1.7 CRDi 136 AT
1.7 CRDi 141
1.7 CRDi 141 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 Euro6 AT
1.2 110
1.2 130
1.2 131
1.2 131 AT
1.6 120
1.6 156
1.6 165 AT
1.6 HDi 116
1.6 HDi 116 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 HDi 92 AT
1.6 HDi 99
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1610 mm / 63.4 in
Size | Length
4525 mm / 178.1 in
Size | Width
1805 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2785 mm / 109.6 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
14%
35%
Pros
- Good towing capacity
- New transmissions
- Much improved exterior styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.