Compare Mazda 5 facelift vs Honda Odyssey 3 vs Honda FR-V
Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
FWD
AWD
1.7
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0
2.2D
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 1235 L / 43.6 cu-ft
439 L / 15.5 cu-ft ~ 1049 L / 37.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
7
7
6
Payload
1200 kg / 2646 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
195/65 R15
215/60 R16
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1610 mm / 63.4 in
Size | Length
4505 mm / 177.4 in
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4285 mm / 168.7 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1800 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Weight
1600.0 kg / 3527.4 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
6J x 16
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
2830 mm / 111.4 in
2680 mm / 105.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
K24
Engine | Bore
87.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.7:1
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 143.7 cu-in / 2354.0 cc
Engine | Power
160.0 hp / 119.3 kW @ 5500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
68.0 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
99.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
218 Nm / 160.8 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2008 ~ 2010
2004 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
38%
49%
43%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved exterior design
- Superb drivetrain reliability
- Beautiful design
- Lots of interior space
- Exceptional drivetrain reliability
- Handsome exterior styling
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Uninspiring
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.